A wannabe dictator was defeated in serious way. Katsutoshi Nishibayashi, a
candidate of Japan Restoration Party, suffered terrible defeat in the mayoral
election of Sakai City on Sunday. It must give the party a greater damage than
previous national elections, because reform of regional autonomy is the raison
d’être of the party. People in Sakai City, who had significant interest to the
integration plan of all cities in Osaka Prefecture, said no to that cause
raised by the party. Now, the populist in Osaka, Toru Hashimoto, is questioned
about his ability of governance.
The result of the election was too obvious for Hashimoto to
deny decline of his party and himself. The incumbent Mayor, Osami Takeyama,
secured about two hundred thousands votes, leaving margin with forty thousands
to defeated Nishibayashi. Although Takeyama won last election as the candidate
of Restroation Party, he shifted his standpoint to the opposite of the party,
claiming that the integration plan would divide and eliminate historically independent
city of Sakai. People in the city overwhelmingly supported his opinion.
The reason of the failure of Hashimoto, a co-leader of the
party, was mainly attributed to people’s skepticisms against him. The
integration plan was originally introduced as a measure for cutting inappropriate
spending of local governments. Hashimoto could not show how that
rationalization would work beyond partial loss of the identity of residents in
the historical city.
However, the greater element of the defeat was skepticisms to
the party. To make his agenda realistic, Hashimoto chose a course to enlarge
his local party a year ago. Osaka Restoration Party became Japan Restoration
Party by merging with an obsolete hawkish group led by Shintaro Ishihara. It
was Hashimoto’s crucial mistake. After that party integration, there existed
two causes in one party: local reform and eccentric conservative movement
Accepting Ishihara’s advice, Hashimoto refused his stepping
down as a co-leader. But, old conservative zombies had sucked up most of
Hashimoto’s political resource, which was popularity based on reform mind. It
is not easy for him to restore political power. If he still wants to be a sort
of political idol, he will be staying as a co-leader of the party. Otherwise,
he should be separated from Ishihara group to promote his cause. As the fever
on new reform ceased and expectation to the challenge against out-of-date
bureaucracy turned to desperation, historical role of the party would be
reaching to an end.