Candidates share a sense that it may be the last chance to
revitalize the party. After shocking defeat in the general election of the
House of Representatives last month, including unprecedented loss of party
president, presidential election of Democratic Party of Japan was announced on
Wednesday. It is obvious that the most important achievement in this unusual
event is to assure the Japanese public that the party can revive as only
alternative to controversial Shinzo Abe administration. However, they have
still not found the way.
For the presidential election, three legislators ran. Who firstly
stepped forward was former Minister for Nuclear Power Policy, Goshi Hosono, who
had been ambitious to scrap the party and build a new party with Innovation
Party, supported by young conservatives in DPJ. Former Minister of Foreign
Affairs and incumbent Deputy President, Katsuya Okada, followed Hosono, with an
appeal of restore fundamental principles of the Party. Most party leaders
support Okada, constructing mainstream of the party. Former Minister of Health
Labor and Welfare, or Mr. Pension Reform, Akira Nagatsuma, tries to catch up
the two with support of leftists related to labor union, appealing to raise
“liberal flag.”
They all uphold economic policy focusing on the working
class with lower income. “Social separation under the one-sided economic policy
by Prime Minister Abe is in the level of intolerable. Appropriate distribution
is urgently needed,” stressed Nagatsuma. Others basically agree with his
argument. However, all of them do not have any credible alternative in
economics. Except some idea such as tax exemption on corporation’s burden on
social security proposed by Hosono, there is no strategy for economic growth
more persuasive than Abenomics.
In terms of national security, those three candidates
emphasize the need to repeal Abe’s Cabinet decision of exercising collective
self-defense right, which is unlikely as long as DPJ and other opposite parties
do not have simple majority in the House of Representatives. On this issue, the
party has serious separation of opinion between the conservatives and the
leftists. Hosono and Okada are relatively taking realistic approach under circumstance
of the decision already made, while Nagatsuma fundamentally denies the
principle of collective self-defense.
The election introduced new system giving greater power to
local politicians and general supporters of DPJ than ever. It is likely that
local opinion will decide which course DPJ will choose. Maintenance or scrap
and build can be the biggest choice of the party.
No comments:
Post a Comment