Dispute over crime of conspiracy is still
ongoing in the Diet session. In the Judicial Committee of House of
Representatives on Friday, the leading parties and the opposite parties are
sharply split on whether the crime would be applied to the ordinary people.
Even how Minister of Justice and bureaucrats in Ministry of Justice stress
exclusion of the ordinary people, the bill of revised Organized Crime
Punishment Law can punish innocent citizens. Shinzo Abe administration has reiterated
that Japan is a country where rule of law is working.
Minister of Justice, Katsutoshi Kaneda, has
been explaining that the ordinary people would not be included in the targets
of the law, trying to emphasize the difference from formerly dismissed crime of
conspiracy in former administration. But, State Minister of Justice, Masahito
Moriyama, told in the Committee a week ago that the ordinary people could not
be excluded from the target of punishment. The opposite parties accused the
contradiction between Kaneda and Moriyama on Friday.
Kaneda defined “ordinary people” as not
having relationship with organized criminal group. While the bill determined
that organized crime group was the target for punishment, Kaneda repeated that
“ordinary people” were the ones who were not related to the groups that would
be targeted by the law. In this definition, all the people targeted by the law
would be excluded from ordinary people. In other words, any ordinary people can
be targeted as a member of criminal group.
The lawmakers with opposite parties argued
that an ordinary people could be included in a criminal group, even though he
or she did not have any recognition of affiliating to it. Moriyama explained
that “gray people,” who were not confirmed as a member of criminal group, could
not be said as not related to criminal group. Police cannot determine whether
the person is a criminal or not unless making detailed investigation.
Accordingly, police will target ordinary people to determine whether they are
related to criminal group.
The bill has a provision that penalty for a
person who surrenders before activation of organized crime will be reduced. A
lawmaker with Democratic Party, Takeshi Shina, argued that the provision would
cause false charge on innocent people. As long as substantiation of crime of
conspiracy depends on confession of the member, intended false confession can
make an innocent people a main plotter of organized crime. Although Kaneda
stressed that objective evidence would be respected, it is law enforcement
organization that decides objectivity of evidence. One would call it rule of
police.
No comments:
Post a Comment