Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito agreed on the basic
concept of new security legislatures on Tuesday. In the latest session between
negotiators of both parties, LDP accepted firm insistence of Komeito on
requirement of agreement from both Houses of National Diet for the activities
of Self-defense Force in advance. That was an only achievement Komeito secured.
In the situation of exercising collective self-defense right and supporting
friend troops for protecting Japan, the legislations do not strictly demand any
approval from the Diet before the operation. Mutilated laws are supposed to be
passing the Diet this summer.
In the discussion of those two leading parties, new
legislatures include International Peace Supporting Act, Important Affective
Situation Safety Securing Act and amendment of Military Offensive Situation
Law. They reached a structural agreement of those legislatures before the final
agreement between Japan and United States on revised security guidelines later
this month.
International Peace Supporting Act is to enable the
government of Japan to send self-defense force anywhere for logistic support as
it did in U.S. operation in Afghanistan or Iraq. To avoid delay of dispatch
with political struggle, LDP was reluctant to include the provision for Diet’s
approval before the order. Komeito needed an achievement in the coalition to
persuade voters in the ongoing campaign for local elections.
The achievement of Komeito was nothing but to pretend itself
to be standing still in the coalition. It was proved by the fact that other
legislatures were mostly mutilated. In the dispatch of self-defense force with
other two laws, Prime Minister, as the supreme commander, needs to get the
approval from the Diet. But, he or she can also do that with an ex post facto
consent in emergency. It does not work as a brake against discretional use of
force by the government.
The leading parties are supposing a case of exercising
collective self-defense in the operation of self-defense force in Hormuz Strait
to support U.S. military. However, admitting collective self-defense right is
not needed for supporting other force, but for protecting members of
self-defense force from arresting by Japanese police after coming back from
foreign land. Supportive operation is possible enough in current laws. U.S. has
to understand that security legislature considered in Shinzo Abe administration
is needed not for maintaining the alliance, but for implementing the
unprecedented agenda of Prime Minister Abe.
No comments:
Post a Comment