Through the discussion in National Diet, unconstitutionality
of new security legislation is getting obvious. Three eminent scholars on
constitution study testified at House of Representatives Commission on the
Constitution that the legislatures including exercising collective self-defense
right without constitutional amendment were violating Constitution of Japan.
Officers of Shinzo Abe administration started defending their attempt to
rewriting interpretation of the constitution. But, the skepticism is spreading
in the leading parties. Abe realized that he had to take greater effort to
persuade the public than he expected.
A Professor of Waseda University, Yasuo Hasebe,
unequivocally determined that the legislatures were unconstitutional, because
they would undermine legal stability in Japan. “It is unconstitutional that the
legislatures allows exercising collective self-defense. It cannot be explained
within the basic logic that the government has been embracing as its official
view,” told Hasebe. He focused on the obscurity in to what extent Japanese
Self-defense Force can use its arms.
Setsu Kobayashi, Professor Emeritus of Keio University,
firmly stated that the legislatures would violate Article 9 of the
constitution. “Article 9 does not render JSDF legal eligibility for military
activity in overseas. Collective self-defense means going to overseas to help
other nations. This is apparently legislations for participating in the wars,”
told Kobayashi. He warned the Diet not to violate constitutionalism by passing
those unconstitutional bills.
Sasada Eiji, Professor of Waseda University, insisted on
inefficiency of Cabinet Legislation Bureau. “I have been recognizing that
Cabinet Legislation Bureau has barely been implementing constitutionality
coping with administrations of Liberal Democratic Party. This time, the bureau
went too far. The legislations are unconstitutional,” told Sasada.
Among those three, Hasebe’s criticism shook LDP, because he
was invited to the commission by LDP lawmakers. One of the members with LDP,
Hajime Funada, admitted that Hasebe’s statement was “something beyond our
expectation.” LDP lawmakers regretted it as an “own goal.”
Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yoshihide Suga, refused to accept
the reasoning of unconstitutionality by three professors. “Legal stability is
preserved in that constitutional interpretation. Assertion of
unconstitutionality cannot be adopted,” told Suga. But discussion over the
legislatures is getting into constitutional argument, which may protract the
legislative process in both Houses in the Diet.
No comments:
Post a Comment