The leading coalition, Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito,
gave up an option of broadening the support for new security legislature.
Seeing delay of decision by Innovation Party to join approval by leading
parties, LDP fixed the schedule that they would pass the bill at the special
committee in the House of Representatives next Wednesday. The opposite parties
will strictly protest against unilateral procedure in the Diet. It is obvious
that supporting rate of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will significantly decline
after the showdown, eroding the political basis of the administration.
To avoid negative impact on the administration, Abe has been
seeking support from Innovation Party on the security bills. However,
Innovation Party is an aggregation of a despotic local leader and his henchmen
and deserters from ailing Democratic Party of Japan. It is basically unlikely
that the party can make integrated decision on an important issue like security
legislature.
In the discussion over collective action against great power
of leading parties, Innovation Party and DPJ have repeatedly made an agreement
and its dismissal. While some right wing lawmakers in Innovation Party wanted
to join the vote for approval in the Diet, others tried to extend timing of the
voting as late as possible. After a breaking off on cooperation, the leaders of
both parties agreed on submitting alternative bills for patrolling maritime
territory, finding a common ground against LDP leadership.
LDP dropped an option of getting support from Innovation
Party, because of tightness of schedule. Constitution of Japan gives power to
House of Representative to revote for a bill, when House of Councillors does
not determine its attitude sixty days after receiving the bill from another
House. To take advantage of that rule, LDP needs to pass the bill in House of
Representatives by July 29th. To make the passage of the bills sure,
LDP had to decide unilateral action on the bill.
Polls have shown that overwhelming part of the nation thinks
discussion over security legislation is not sufficient. It is a basic demand of
Abe administration to persuade the people about the necessity of new security
measures. As discussion in the committee goes, problems in the bills appeared
to the public. It is unnecessary for Japanese government to have power to
exercise collective self-defense to protect its territory or maintain
Japan-U.S. alliance.
If the leading parties pass the bills with unilateral
approval, public will accuse undemocratic decision, losing credibility on
security policy of Abe administration. Along with doubt on economic policy
caused by European uncertainty in market economy, Abe may face serious downfall
this fall.
No comments:
Post a Comment