Newspapers carried scoop news about the
outline of new legislation creating Crime of Preparing Terrorism or Else, which
would be a different version of Crime of Conspiracy. The legislation would
determine 277 kinds of crime to apply. While the list selected certain serious
crimes related to terrorism, they reserved arbitrariness in the legislation for
arresting anyone they would like before committing actual crime. It is not rule
of law but rule of man.
Shinzo Abe administration has been seeking
legislation for Crime of Preparing Terrorism or Else to ratify United Nations
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime in 2000, which was already
ratified by 187 countries or regions. The convention requires the parties to
legislate punishment against serious crimes with detention for four years or
more. There are 600 or more kinds of crime in Japan, which can be recognized as
those serious crimes.
Japanese government interpreted the
convention as requiring legislation against serious crimes committed by
criminal organization and selected 277 crimes within five categories actually
assumable as committed by organized criminal group.
Category 1 is activation of terrorism,
including organized murder, arson to inhabited structure, hijacking, firing
gun, splashing poisonous chemical materials like sarin. Category 2 for drug
lists up 29 cases like smuggling or distribution of cocaine or opium. Category
3 is exploitation of human including human trafficking, illegal immigration of
collective stowaways, forced labor or selling and buying internal organs.
Category 4 lists up organized fraud or blackmailing, forgery of securities or
concealment of criminal profit, and Category 5 is about interference against
judicial process like perjury, destruction of evidence or supporting getaway.
They are the crimes to be punished. It is
the problem, however, that they are recognized as crimes even in the situation
of preparation. If there is an agreement on activation of serious crime, the
activity will be punished even before committing actual crime. To limit the
application of the legislation, the crime has to be done by organized criminal
group, which purpose of assembly is activation of listed crime.
It is concerned that the government will be
able to investigate any organization including labor union or private
association. When the police unilaterally realized a group having changed into
criminal assembly, its members would be arrested immediately. The opposite
parties oppose the legislation with concern of arbitrary exercise of state
power against innocent citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment