It sounded like the Last Judgment. A working group of
Central Disaster Prevention Council on Monday released an estimation of damages
by possible great earthquake in Nankai Trough, a deep ditch extended along
offshore Japan. Although it supposed the worst case, the estimated damages
would be too great for the nation to be resilient. The thing is how the
Japanese respond to it.
Nankai Trough is the border between the Eurasia Plate and
the Philippine Sea Plate in the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. Frictions between
those two plates had been producing a number of earthquakes with magnitude 8
occurred once in every 100 to 150 years. The estimation deliberately took the
worst case with magnitude 9.1, which had not been recorded in the history.
The supposed number of victims in Nankai Trough Earthquake
is 323 thousand, which is seventeen times higher than Great East Japan
Earthquake in 2011. The damage to Japanese economy would be ¥220 trillions,
which amounts to 42% of gross domestic products of Japan. ¥170 trillions out of
whole damages would be direct damages to houses and industrial facilities,
while decline of productions and services was estimated to be ¥44 trillions. This
scenario actually means the bankruptcy of Japan.
The estimation reminds of how the government of Japan has
been concentrating its development on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. Big
cities like Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya are located on the shoreline. A large
amount of investments was dropped on those city areas, with the initiatives of
politics, bureaucracies and business entities. Although some politicians had
tried to shift the axis from Pacific coast to Japan Sea side, they were
excluded from politics with money scandals.
The government is mainly responding to the estimates with
strengthening infrastructure. Along with “homeland strengthening initiative” addressed
by leading Liberal Democratic Party, the government invests on renewing roads
and bridges, reinforcing buildings against earthquake, or stocking foods and
fuels. The government has no idea of reducing the risks by downsizing big
cities.
The counter actions of industries are relocating their
facilities to safer places. Some are moving their factory to rural area and
others have plans for setting facilities on hills to escape from tsunami. But
as long as the government is investing on shoreline cities, dissemination of
functions of big city would not be achieved. Although the lesson we learned
from the great earthquake two years ago was that we must review our civilization,
this ailing government cannot run anywhere but on railroads already laid.
No comments:
Post a Comment