The result was not overall agreement, but agreement by the
end of this year. Twelve leaders delivered a joint statement after a meeting of
Trans-Pacific Partnership in Bali, Indonesia, in which they promised to go
forward to a comprehensive and well-balanced regional agreement. Japan
delegation, which kept on saying that leaders would achieve an overall
agreement, was busy for explaining the result. All stemmed from the basic
attitude of bureaucrats not to share information with the nations.
Although the parties had agreed on some issues including
information service and assistance for emerging countries, a lot of issues
still remain without final breakthrough. They are access to market,
intellectual property, environment, government procurement and so on. The
absence of President of the United States cast a shadow on the process of
meeting seeking broader agreement. While they would be making efforts to have
final agreement, it was unclear whether they could achieve the goal originally
set by the leadership of U.S.
For Japan, agriculture is the most controversial area among
all. Leading Liberal Democratic Party had been explaining that five products,
--rice, wheat, beef and pork, dairy products, and origin of sweets--, would be
protected as exemptions of non-tariff principle, which did not make sense from
the beginning. As the negotiation reached agreements in some issues, the party
turned its attitude from protecting all of five to “considering which market
can be opened.”
Frustration of the people is represented by these words;
“What’s going on?” At the time when Japan joined the negotiation, the
explanation of government and LDP was “We go there to see how the negotiation
goes. If it harms our national interest, we may step out of it.” After
multi-national negotiation ended, they said “Well, we are going to have
bilateral meetings with parties for now. Negotiation is still in the early
stage.” Next message the Japanese heard from delegation was “Ok, we are having
overall agreement.” It is fair that the people thought it as a deception.
Most people realize the difficulty of insisting five crucial
agricultural products to be protected in the framework of high-level free
trade. For them, political responsibility matters the most. LDP promised in the
election last year that it would protest abolition of tariffs without
sanctuary. What its lawmakers are doing is to break that promise shamelessly,
just following bureaucrats, mainly from Ministries of Foreign Affairs and of
Economy, Trade and Industry. As long as bureaucrats keep on hiding the negotiation
process, responsible politics will not root in Japan.
No comments:
Post a Comment