Both governments of Japan and the United States agreed on
revising Guidelines for Security Cooperation by the end of next year. Different
from two previous guidelines, the first for dealing with potential threat of
the Soviet Union in 1978 and the second for preparing for the contingency in
Korean Peninsula, they will determine a set of measures against China. While
Japan expects a firm commitment of U.S. enough to deter Chinese proceed to the
Pacific Ocean, U.S. looks reluctant to be involved in Sino-Japan dispute over
Senkaku Islands. How great the impact of this cooperation on China is still
unclear.
The agreement was made in the U.S.-Japan Security
Consultative Committee, often called “two plus two” with attendance of
Secretaries of State and Defense of U.S. and Ministers of Foreign Affairs and
Defense of Japan. Unlike precedents of the Committee being held in U.S. cities
including Washington, D.C. or Honolulu, it was the first time for it to be
convened in Japan. The Japanese officials reasoned it to be a demonstration
toward China.
Joint Statement notified concerns against Chinese behavior.
“[T]he Ministers continue to encourage China to play a responsible and
constructive role in regional stability and prosperity, to adhere international
norms of behavior, as well as to improve openness and transparency in its
military modernization with its rapid expanding military investments,” says the
Statement. In the press conference, Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, said that
U.S. would strongly oppose any unilateral or forcible action to erode Japan’s
administration of Senkaku.
However, the agreement did not endorse possibly full-fledged
military preparation of Japan. Asahi Shimbun reported a story that U.S. did not
agree with referring to Japan’s possession of “striking capability of enemy’s
bases” in the Joint Statement. That capability would change Japan’s role from
having strictly defensive capability to joining striking, not necessarily be
offensive, operation. That is what Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, has
enthusiastically been seeking.
While their attitude toward the outside is not clearly
determined, internal affairs have not well been addressed. Although both
governments stressed their efforts to reduce burdens of Okinawa, where 74% of
U.S. bases in Japan are located in, the people in Okinawa are still frustrated
with the attitude of the governments. Most measures, including admitting
entrance to some U.S. bases designated to be returned to Okinawa and fishery in
a practice area, are recognized as already taken for granted. Relocation of
Futenma Marine Air Base is still up in the air.
No comments:
Post a Comment