Strange enthusiasm over “historical” speech of Japanese
Prime Minister at United States Congress has not ceased the following day.
Japanese newspapers reported various responses to the interpretation of history
by Shinzo Abe. Both governments of Japan and U.S. cerebrated the event they
produced. Others including South Korea, China, the opposite parties in Japan
and even U.S. media were not satisfied with his biased views on history.
Asahi Shimbun reported a comment of U.S. Ambassador to
Japan, Caroline Kennedy, in which she approved Abe’s attitude of mostly
succeeding past statements on war-end anniversary. Former Japanese Ambassador
to U.S., Ichiro Fujisaki, accepted Abe’s speech as appealing to sentiments of
the Americans. Indeed, Abe’s reference to Carol King might impressed the
Americans that Japan would be globally standing by U.S. troops in the winter,
spring, summer and fall.
South Korea was one of the most frustrated with Abe’s
speech. “While it might have been an opportunity for a turning point of reconciliation
and cooperation with neighbor nations, lacking such recognition and sincere
apology was very regrettable,” told a spokesman for South Korean Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. That was a criticism on not referring to comfort woman issue
in the speech, in spite of Abe’s promise to succeed Kono Statement in the joint
press conference with U.S. President Barack Obama the day before.
China was a little more complicated. While media degraded
the speech as avoiding “aggression” or “apology,” government official showed a
response more neutral. “We are consistently urging the leaders of Japan to
express an attitude of facing and reflecting past history of aggression
including Murayama Statement,” told a Chinese spokesman. China is looking
closely at how Abe will deal with the expression of his seventieth anniversary
statement this summer.
The opposite parties in Japan were furious about Abe’s
announcement that he will pass the legislations for new Japan-U.S. security
guidelines in the Diet by this summer. “There has been no example of promising
the time of passage of such important bills yet submitted at a foreign
congress,” told President of Democratic Party of Japan, Katsuya Okada. There
will be a kind of mess in the Diet this summer.
Tokyo Shimbun introduced the responses of U.S. media. It
reported that Washington Post showed a viewpoint that it realized Abe’s
intention to impress his careful attitude on history and devastation of war.
But Tokyo quoted a critical views on equivocal apology of Abe by New York Times
and on avoidance of apology by Wall Street Journal. After all, Abe’s speech was
only welcomed by producers of the event.
No comments:
Post a Comment