Government of Japan on Wednesday announced
its plan to lift evacuation order in a part of towns which were too heavily
contaminated by radioactive materials emitted from First Fukushima Nuclear
Power Plant for the residents to get back home. The plan estimates that those
people can return home by 2022 after governmental effort of decontamination of
the land. Anyway, who would live in a house built on an island of residential
area on the sea of contaminated forest?
Headquarters of Measures for Nuclear
Disaster and Reconstruction Promotion Committee, both of which were presided by
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, agreed on releasing ban on the area designated to be
unlivable, which had been registered right after the severe nuclear accident in
the plant in 2011. About 24 thousands of people had to evacuate from their
sweet home and still are living in temporary houses.
The plan explains that radiation level in
the evacuation area has been naturally lowered even without artificial effort
of decontamination. Embracing concern on delay of reconstruction with negative
image on the products from Fukushima area, if evacuation would be prolonged,
the government decided to make livable spots for public facilities such as city
office, train station or community center. That is based on the idea that the
people will need basic infrastructure for ordinary life, when they are
requested to go back home independent from governmental assistance.
However, the people do not seem to return
to their home so quickly. In the survey by Reconstruction Agency to the
evacuees from Okuma Town, where broken reactors of the plant is located, only
11% of the people was hoping to go home. Considering scarcity of jobs or
schools for kids, young people are inevitably reluctant to return their
hometown, even if a part of it is decontaminated and resumes to be a community.
Long time evacuation exhausted their motivation to resume their life in
hometown.
It is always obvious that the return-home policy
is to justify traditional nuclear policy led by national government, based on
underestimation of the impact of nuclear disaster. Cost for decontamination and
building infrastructure is paid by national government, leaving responsibility
of power generating company aside. While local governments around the plant
expect sufficient support to rebuild their hometowns, the government has no
plan to decontaminate whole forests. It is possible that the government coerce
the evacuated people to go home in newly decontaminated spots and cut off the
support for their evacuation. It may create another type of refugees.
No comments:
Post a Comment