Japan is going to make another decision without fundamental
discussion on international argument. The Liberal Democratic Party and New
Komeito agreed on accepting the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on
the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, or the Hague Treaty.
Leaving a question about conceptual difference over parental rights, the
National Diet of Japan will adopt the treaty in May. Main reason is that every
developed country is joining the treaty. To have independent discussion does
not matter for political leaders.
The treaty deals with the cases in which one of the divorced
parents have taken a child away out of the country and another parent loses
opportunities to meet the child. A signatory owes duty to find the child and
return back. The United States has been requiring Japan to approve the treaty,
because there are a growing number of cases that an American father wants to
return his kid from Japan. The typical reason that Japanese mother would take
her kid to her home country is to escape from domestic violence of her husband.
The point is very simple. There is a difference of concept
on who has the right to access their kid after they divorced. The Japanese
civil law determines that only one of the divorced parents can have parental
rights on their child, while both of them can have that right in US. In Japan,
it is basically the decision of a father or a mother with parental rights
whether or not he/she let the kid meet another parent. On the other hand, both
of the divorced parents share the right to approach their kids whenever they
need.
The most important point for Japan has, therefore, been
whether a Japanese parent can dismiss the request of returning a child to
America when there is a reasonable possibility of violence. But the political leaders
decided to accept the treaty without any guarantee of protection for child.
It is likely that the leaders might have regarded the treaty
as a diplomatic tool. The Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is going to visit US later
this month. Though he has been willing to meet President Obama to demonstrate
good Japan-US relationship, no major agenda had been set for the summit. Abe
gave up to get conclusion of the relocation of Futenma Marine Air Base in
Okinawa, and could not get a freehand on the negotiation over Trans-Pacific
Partnership. He still cannot find a fruit of the meeting. The Hague Treaty may
be recognized as one of the few “souvenirs,” which makes Obama to be positive
for a dialogue with Japan to gain his political advantage. As long as Japanese leaders
are submissive to US, a young Japanese woman has to be cautious in marrying with
a handsome US guy.
No comments:
Post a Comment