The motivation for deepening the relationship with Africa
has changed from humanitarian responsibility to business chance. “It is obvious
that Africa will be the center of growth in the middle of this twenty-first
century. It is now we should invest to Africa,” told Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
at the closing remark of the 5th Tokyo International Conference on African
Development (TICAD) on Sunday. Business, however, is closely related to
competition. There is no optimistic vision for Japan to take over China, a
giant in African development.
Started in early 1990s when Japan was still an economic
giant in the Western world in the post-Cold War period, TICAD had been a
framework to encourage economic growth and stability of African countries by
Japan and some organizations of the United Nations. After entering new century,
the framework worked as one of the promoters for implementing the Millennium
Developing Goals set by UN. In the emphasis of African development to prevent
poverty in the framework of Group Eight of developed countries, Japan, as the
chair of G8 that year, led the discussion for sustainable development in TICAD
IV in 2008.
This year, the parties emphasized the necessity of private
initiative in investment to Africa. The Yokohama Declaration, the achieved
document of the conference, determined private sector as necessary driving
force for growth. In that context, the declaration required African countries
to organize the environment for investment and legislative system. To make the
investment effective for ordinary citizens, it emphasized the importance of
deregulation. In the conference, Japan pledged $32 billion for next five years
to build infrastructure in electricity or transportation and human resource
worth of thirty thousands. It also required measures for anti-terrorism to
encourage investment.
Over the years, however, China has been the most active
country in African development. To make the effort successful, Japan needs to
sell Africa its advantage to China. It is trying to distinguish its efforts
from Chinese-type development, which has been importing African natural
resources, while exporting industrial products to Africa. Focusing on
partnership and ownership, Japan appeals its effort as different from colonial-type
management of China.
Meanwhile, China criticizes Japanese effort as buying the votes
for permanent membership in UN Security Council, to which China strongly
opposes. It is undeniable that Japan has been expecting some return from its
investment to Africa. After all, it would be Africa who determines the winner
of the competition between Japan and China.
No comments:
Post a Comment