The only thing those three defense ministers agreed on was
cooperating each other to face potential threat of North Korea. Defense
Minister of Japan, Itsunori Onodera, had a meeting with US Secretary of
Defense, Chuck Hagel, and National Defense Minister of South Korea, Kim
Kuan-jin, taking advantage of opportunity of Shangri-la Dialogue, an
international conference on security issues by ministers, in Singapore. The
trilateral meeting held for the first time last three years also showed some
problems among the parties. Most of them stemmed from Japan.
In a joint statement, three ministers agreed on the notion
that three countries were going to cooperate for deterring further intimidation
with the development of nuclear and missile technology by North Korea,
recognizing those activities as serious threat to the world security. They also
shared the importance of their cooperation for peace and stability in Asia-Pacific
region and the world, agreeing on measures to deal with piracy offshore of
Somalia and the Gulf of Aden, promoting humanitarian aid and disaster relief,
search and rescue exercise and anti-proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction.
US concern on the rise of Japan’s right wing movement,
however, has been casting shadow on Japan-US bilateral relationship. Although
it did not appear at the trilateral meeting, what Onodera stressed at the
speech in the conference was denying the negative aspect of US-Japan
relationship. “There are criticisms of pointing Japan’s leaning on right and
challenging world order. But all of them are based on misunderstanding,” told
Onodera.
The fact is that Onodera is not affiliated to the same
political group as PM Shinzo Abe in the Liberal Democratic Party. Graduated
Matsushita Institute of Government and Management and later taught at a
university in Sendai as a professor, Onodera has been regarded as a
scholar-type dovish lawmaker away from hawkish group. Even how he tries to
speak for Abe, it is not representing the policy of the administration.
Although Onodera emphasized that current administration was following the
standpoint of former cabinets on the apology over Japan’s responsibility in
World War II, Abe had actually been refusing to make his attitude clear on this
issue.
South Korea is highly skeptical about Japan’s attitude on
interpretation of history. On the other hand, the Japanese are frustrated with
South Korean leader’s attitude shown by the visit to disputed Takeshima Island
by former President, Lee Myung-bak. With those negative diplomatic elements,
two nations cannot exchange their top leaders for a long time. The only
achievement in Singapore was reconfirming that their ministers could at least
meet and spend a short time in one room, if only they would be talking about
North Korea.
No comments:
Post a Comment