Naming itself as “Pacific Nation,” though, the United States
does not show its willingness to come up with the expectation of its allies in
the region. U.S. failed in making a progress on maritime disputes in the sixth
round of Security and Economic Dialogue with China on Thursday. U.S. looks like
behaving only for its own sake, leaving behind interests of countries suffering
from China’s unilateral assertion.
Chinese Foreign Minister, Yang Jiechi, raised his voice for
securing China’s interest in the South and East China Sea. “China is determined
to protect sovereignty and maritime interest. The United States needs to take
neutral position and should not take one side in this issue,” told him. Yomiuri
Shimbun reported that China side seemed to have quoted statement of Chinese
President, Xi Jinping, which had said “Reinforcement of military alliance
focusing on the third party is useless for regional security.”
U.S. Secretary State, John Kerry, did not sharply rebuffed
against China’s attitude. He did not mention this issue in the joint statement
of S&ED, while Chinese side stressed their sovereignty and maritime right.
“Chinese actions in the South China Sea and the East China Sea have generated concerns.
And while the United States does not take sides on the sovereignty questions
underlying these territorial disputes, we do believe that claimants should
exercise restraint – all claimants – and adhere to peaceful and diplomatic ways
of dealing with their disagreements,” Kerry told in a press availability in
Beijing. As long as U.S. keeps this kind of neutrality, it is literally
standing on China side. It is surely on the context of China’s strategy to
divide the Pacific Ocean in two.
Instead, U.S. delegation was interested in North Korea,
cyber security, climate change or wildlife trafficking. On cyber security, both
exchanged criticisms against each other, raising prosecution of five Chinese
military officers as industrial espionages or U.S. undercover surveillance
revealed by former spy agent, Edward Snowden. But other issues were all about
cooperation between the two. To the eyes of Japanese people, they looked like
dealing with their own interests, leaving others’ interests behind.
U.S. opinion over the relationship with China has been
divided between deterrence and accommodation. But top officials recently
reiterated that U.S. had no intention to contain China, and emphasize its
tolerance to China’s emerge. If U.S. has no intention to face China with
military deterrence, it must not send mixed signal to Japan by saying that U.S.
supports Japan’s administration in Senkaku Islands or by emphasizing that those
islands fall on category of U.S.-Japan Security Treaty.
No comments:
Post a Comment