A century ago, the biggest ally of Japan
was United Kingdom. Although the friendship of both nations were torn apart in
the Great War, moderate relationship has been maintained after the war. One
typical similarity of them is political system. Japan adopted parliamentary
cabinet system, which had been laid in U.K., after the collapse of imperial
governance in pre-war era. Now, the system is in jeopardy, as U.K. regrets its
version of democracy shown in the national referendum for leaving European
Union.
Asahi Shimbun ran a featured article on
Tuesday, which warned the readers that Brexit would not be something happened
in a country far away from us. One common element between the choice of U.K.
citizens and current Japanese politics is anger of voters against politicians
who do not implement their campaign promise. Some political leaders upheld
leaving E.U. and promised to improve fiscal support on National Health Service,
compensated by unnecessary payment to E.U. But, they started saying that they
had not referred to how to use the saved money.
The same thing happened in Japan. Liberal
Democratic Party promised that the party would oppose Trans-Pacific Partnership
in the general election in late 2012. But, after taking leadership, LDP
President Shinzo Abe began to promote the negotiation with other Pacific countries.
In the campaign of the election of House of Councillors, there are some
agricultural organizations, which have traditionally been supporting LDP, that
defy LDP candidates.
Another point is contradiction of majority
between parliament and public. According to the report of Asahi, lawmakers for
leaving E.U. only amounted 147 out of all 650, while 454 upheld staying.
Nevertheless, “leave” occupied majority in the referendum. In bipartisan system
in U.K., Conservative Party kept support from certain well-to-do class, while
Labor Party rooted on workers. However, those parties could not properly deal
with current problem stemming from globalization.
In the Diet of Japan, lawmakers who uphold
constitutional amendment occupy two-third majority in the House of
Representatives. The result of the election next week may create that power
also in the House of Councillors. It is not impossible that the Constitution will
be amended with minority leadership in the public.
As shown in U.K., enthusiasm based on
unidentified frustration covering Japanese society can lead the nation to an
inexperienced direction. Facing a reality that China unilaterally claims its
right on the islands in East or South China Sea, political leaders in Japan
could not draw viable and persuasive answer. “We need at least to prepare
possible invasion,” or “We need at least make proactive attack to the potential
enemy,” is the way the Japanese thought at the beginning of World War II.
No comments:
Post a Comment