With excessive expectation to revitalization of economy,
there is a few criticisms against Abe administration in Japan. The discussion
over Prime Minister’s policy speech in the Diet would be a litmus test for
healthiness of democracy. In that perspective, questions by the president of
Democratic Party of Japan, Banri Kaieda, in the plenary session of the House of
Representative on Tuesday were useful as a list of talking points against
political handling of Shinzo Abe.
In his questions, Kaieda raised three risks in the future of
politics in Japan led by Abe: economy heavily leaned on investing to building
infrastructure, diplomacy ignoring jeopardy of further deterioration in
Japan-China relationship, and domestic politics based on revisionism.
Citing enthusiasm on construction demand for Tokyo Olympic
games in 2020 and price hike of building materials for reconstruction from the Great
East Japan Earthquake, Kaieda criticized Abe’s economic policies as
insufficient. He stressed that Abe’s expectation on higher wages in this sprig was
baseless, because the policies had brought higher price of imported raw
materials, pushing cost on manufacturers and families. Support for low-income
families would be falling short of, Kaieda indicated, by inappropriate
distribution of the income from higher consumption tax this spring.
On Abe’s resemblance of Japan-China relationship with
Anglo-German rivalry in post-Great War period, DPJ president asked, “Why didn’t
you say that there would never be military collision with China again?” He
elaborated that Abe actually locked the door, making contradiction by saying
that all doors were open for China and South Korea. “There are black area
around Japan on your globe, when you say you promote ‘look down globe’
diplomacy,” Kaieda also told.
On Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine, Kaieda recommended to
build new memorial where everyone in and outside of Japan could go, bringing up
the visit of U.S. Secretaries of State and Defense to Chidorigafuchi War Victim
Memorial last October. On Abe’s “positive pacifism,” he downgraded it as
nothing new, as seen in examples: emergency assistance to Philippine natural
disaster, countermeasures against piracy in Aden Bay, or overseas development
assistance to developing countries.
On revisionism, Kaieda challenged Abe’s determination to
amend the constitution. He criticized reinterpretation of the constitution for
exercising collective self-defense right, rather than changing provisions of
the Constitution of Japan.
Although most of those points made sense, Japanese media was
cool to his questions, mainly because DPJ has not recovered from the defeats in
the election of both houses. So, what are you guys doing, if you are against
unilateral leadership of Liberal Democrats?
No comments:
Post a Comment