President of Asahi Shimbun, a leading newspaper with seven
million circulations, held a press conference in the evening of Thursday to
announce his apology about the wrong report on Yoshida Interview, in which
former Director of First Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, Masao Yoshida, told
about the situation of the plant right after severe accident occurred three and
a half years ago. He apologized on sending a wrong image as if workers with
Tokyo Electric Power Company in the plant escaped from their responsibility
against Yoshida’s order. That is an ordinary story in Japanese media, so far. What
makes the story different from usual scandal is that some conservative papers
do not stop criticizing Asahi, accusing that it eroded national interest.
There were three points in the apology of the president,
Tadakazu Ito; wrong report of Yoshida Interview, delay of correction of the
reports on comfort woman and rejection of an article of series column
criticizing Asahi’s attitude on comfort woman issue. Ito also apologized in an
article on Friday that expression of “retreat against director’s order” had
been inappropriate in the article in May, in which it reported ninety percent
of the workers evacuated against Yoshida’s order. Ito said the paper would make
efforts of verification on why the mistake happened. Ito indicated that he
would step down after paving a way to reform the news company.
Yomiuri and Sankei got excited with the apology of a big
rival. In editorial, Yomiuri emphasized that Asahi’s apology on comfort woman
had been too late to maintain Japan’s national interest. Yomiuri did not
elaborate what exactly was the national interest it took as precious, anyway.
The paper ignored the erosion of people’s interest when its president joined the
governmental council for oppressive Designated Secrecy Protection Act and
helped the government activate the law.
Possessing a bitter memory on wrong report of “death of Jiang
Zemin,” Sankei looked to be paralyzed with victory. “We hope Asahi to retrieve
honor of the workers with TEPCO and regain dignity of Japanese people,” said its
editorial. The paper insisted that Asahi needed to apologize more. Mainichi
accused those criticisms as too much, while it criticized Asahi’s insufficient
effort for exact reporting and failure in apologizing soon.
This accusation game among media intensively ignores
fundamental issue, which is that TOPCO was actually thinking about entire
retreat leaving exploding reactors, regardless workers had escaped against
director’s order or not. Dishonor of the leadership would never be shaken by
such trivial arguments. One thing the people have to notice is that politics is
willing to be involved in the discussion. “It is true that many suffered from
the wrong report and honor of Japan was harmed in international society,” told
Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe. Right wing lawmakers required Ito’s testimony in
the Diet. Be careful of this administration oppressing freedom of speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment