The world managed to keep the momentum for tackling climate
change. Conference of Parties of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change concluded Paris Agreement on Saturday, which required all parties to
make every effort to eliminate emission of greenhouse gasses in the latter half
of this century. While both developed and developing countries shared necessity
for setting binding goals, the agreement heavily relied on conscience of each
country. Implementation is the biggest concern for the future of fight against
threat of global warming.
It is true that the outcome of Paris conference cannot be
underestimated. In the Article 2 of Paris Agreement, the parties were mandated
to hold global average temperature below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and
further pursue 1.5°C, to increase ability to adapt to the adverse impact of
climate change and foster climate resilience, and to make financial flows
consistent to implement the goals.
However, in the reflection of insufficiency of Kyoto
Protocol in 1997, which set obligatory goal for reducing greenhouse gasses on
each parties, Paris Agreement did not took a style of posing numerical goal on
each country. While the agreement required designated effort to each party, it
avoided demanding concrete achievement with actual time limit. Instead, it
included a clause to require all parties review their efforts every five years.
Central concept of the agreement was equal but
differentiated responsibilities. To tame the argument of developing nations,
which insisted on that current global warming was brought by industrialization
of developed countries, developed countries accepted broad responsibilities.
The agreement mandated developed nations financial support for developing
countries to take measures against climate change, not having actual amount of
money.
How to reach the goal basically depends on each country.
Although the conference encouraged the world independent on fossil fuels, there
was no description on independent from atomic fuels. While it acknowledged the
need to promote universal access to sustainable energy, the definition of
sustainable energy is not clear. How the conference judges the agreement of
Japan to export nuclear power plant to India?
Paris Agreement was epoch making in terms of setting alternative
goals to Kyoto Protocol. But, it cannot be a viable scenario to achieve the environment
completely preferable to human being. More determined study on true aspect of global
environment and correct way to choose is needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment