Japan Sport Council disclosed two designs for new national
stadium for Tokyo Olympic in 2020. Both drafts had common concepts, which was
drawn by Japanese designer, which cost was cheaper than former one designed by
a foreign designer and which concept was based on woody structure. Caused by
steep growth in raw material for construction, the central facility for Olympic
games will be looking boring. One can question: Did we really need to replace
old national stadium?
As a conclusion of international competition, JSC in 2012 chose
an outlandish design by Zaha Hadid, who had been dubbed as Queen of the Curve.
While JSC initially estimated the cost for construction as ¥130 billion, it
proved to be costing ¥353 billion after detailed calculation. In November 2013,
JSC revised the plan with smaller floor limiting the cost as low as ¥178
billion, the estimation again hiked up to ¥252, because of inappropriate
prospect on price of resources. Hadid plan was finally turned down.
New plan A will cost ¥149 billion. The building is 49 meters
high, quite lower than 70 meters of Hadid plan, with three layers stand and
roof made by mixture of steel and wood. According to Mainichi Shimbun, team A
consisted with Japanese designer, Kengo Kuma, architect company, Azusa Sekkei,
and joint developers led by Taisei Corporation. The concept was named Stadium
in the Forest.
The cost of new plan B will be ¥150 billion, ¥0.1 billion
higher than plan A. The height of the building is 54 meters. Its stand has two-layered
structure and the roof has wavy look. The greatest uniqueness can see in 72
wooden pillars surrounding the stadium. The joint venture by major Japanese
general construction corporation of Takenaka, Shimizu and Obayashi established
team B with designer, Toyoo Ito, and architect, Nihon Sekkei. Its concept
strictly matched with plan A, which was Stadium in the Forest.
One thing clear: both plans are definitely not
international. JSC seemed not to have realized difficulty of implementing
designs by Hadid at the beginning. The preparation team also faced sharp
international criticisms in the plagiarism scandal over official logo of Tokyo
Olympic. Japan got back to the basic of simple and sturdy, less personal and
cheap is best.
Nevertheless, the leadership is unworthy designated efforts
to recover failure in designing. President of Tokyo Olympic Organization
Committee, former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori revealed his preference to one of
the two plans before selecting process. “Watching exterior, plan B is better.
That has typical image of sports. It looks like pavilion of ancient Greece,”
told Mori to the reporters. “Plan A has no brightness of having Olympic games,”
he added. In Japan, someone always pull the legs of frontrunner.
No comments:
Post a Comment