The Presidents of Democratic Party of Japan and Innovation
Party, Katsuya Okada and Yorihisa Matsuno, agreed on to establish new political
group in the Diet starting next session. Main purpose was to enhance mutual
credibility for achieving replaceable government with possibility of
concentration of both parties. They released common policies for the election
of House of Councillors next summer. However, it is still unclear whether those
two parties are going to make progress in hand-in-hand manner.
After leaving government in late 2012, DPJ has been an
underdog of sweeping Shinzo Abe administration. The biggest opposite party has
exercised nothing against unilateral policies, including legislation for
concealing designated secrets of the government, cabinet decision for
reinterpreting Constitution of Japan to allow exercising collective
self-defense right or redefining Japan-United States alliance. DPJ has not
shown its resilience from devastating defeat in the general election in 2012.
Innovation Party has been deadlocked with internal dispute
over political direction they would choose. Having been a cooperative body for
surviving elections, Innovation Party reiterated collision among Osaka group
led by Toru Hashimoto, Tokyo conservative group represented by former lawmaker
Shintaro Ishihara, and some lawmakers fled from DPJ with quarrel over policies.
After split between regional unit in Osaka and lawmakers in Tokyo, the party
was doomed to be eliminated.
One common cause for them was to be united against leading
party, or Liberal Democratic Party. “Our two parties are going to make united
efforts to compete with big leading parties,” told Okada. “To maintain tension
in the Diet, which structure has been big one and small others, the opposite
parties cannot be fragmented,” followed Matsuno.
They upheld seven common policies, including realistic
security policy or reform painful for the politicians. On new security
legislation, they agreed on abolishing all unconstitutional provisions. With
initiative of Innovation Party, they embraced a goal of reducing cost for human
resource of bureaucracy by 20%. Achieving zero nuclear energy in 2030s was
another policy they shared.
While Matsuno looked forward to party integration, Okada was
negative on it. Making matters complicated, some conservatives in DPJ require
party integration with dissolution of DPJ. Former DPJ Prime Minister Yoshihiko
Noda said to have been frustrated with cooperation with Matsuno, who left DPJ
opposing consumption tax hike policy of Noda administration. Internal dispute
and no progress is still a big problem for DPJ.
No comments:
Post a Comment