The news delivered from Shanghai by world
major economies last weekend was as simple as declaring to do their best for
stabilizing volatile market. While the declaration actually urged major
economies to introduce structural reform or financial mobilization, it was not
so easy for them to implement. Group 20 cannot be said as an effective
framework to lead a solution on crucial issues.
Communiqué of G20 Finance Ministers and
Central Bank Governors Meeting was just true in analyzing the situation of
world economy. “The global recovery continues, but it remains uneven and falls
short of our ambition for strong, sustainable and balanced growth,” said the
communiqué. It raised vulnerabilities surrounding the world, including
“volatile capital flows, a large drop of commodity prices, escalated
geopolitical tensions, the shock of a potential UK exit from the European Union
and a large and increasing number of refugees in some regions.” One who reads
newspaper could have realized those problems before G20 declared it.
One topic was that G20 agreed on
considering capital regulation, which limited capital flows out of emerging
economies. Caused by monetary policy of United States ending zero-interest
policy or steep drop of crude oil price, money is escaping from emerging
economies. “Given the current development in the global economy, we will better
monitor capital flows, including more timely identification of risks, and take
stock of and review policy tools and frameworks as appropriate to address
challenges arising from large and volatile capital flows, drawing on country
experiences,” described the communiqué.
In terms of urging regulation on capital
flows, Japan took an initiative with proposal of taking necessary measures. United
States or International Monetary Fund followed Japanese leadership. However,
the chair country, China, was reluctant in introducing actual policy, worrying inconvenience
in capital flows in China. “Capital flows is temporary and unimportant problem,”
told Governor of People’s Bank of China, Zhou Xiaochuan in his press
conference.
After all, G20 countries were only
successful in showing basic attitude of cooperation, leaving actual issues
behind. U.S. expected China or Germany to have financial mobilization. While
China showed its willingness, Germany was negative on it, raising possibility
of bubble economy with huge financial debt. Japan urged China further effort
for structural reform, a change from growth led by investment to consumption.
G20 cannot determine what they can do.
No comments:
Post a Comment