In the discussion in Budget Committee of
the House of Representatives, a lawmaker with Democratic Party of Japan,
Yu-ichiro Tamaki, asked Abe of his idea about relationship between economic
trend and pension system. “If GPIF fails in yielding profit, is it possible
that pension benefit of each recipient will be reduced?” asked Tamaki.
Abe looked sober. “Without obtaining
assumed profit, it will affect the payment accordingly. In the case that the
system cannot afford to provide benefit, the benefit will be regulated,” told
Abe. “But, we observe it in a long-term perspectives,” added Abe, “and
temporary gain or lost would not be reflected to the payment.” Any sense of
responsibility for losing public money could not be detected.
There were consistent skepticisms on GPIF
from the beginning. The fund keeps pension money as much as ¥130 trillion, one
fourth of gross domestic products of Japan. Abe administration decided to raise
the ratio of stock exchange from 25% to 50% in 2014. It promoted outsourcing
the operation, expecting higher return than buying low-interested Japanese
national bond.
Tokyo Stock Exchange has experienced steep
decline from the beginning of this year. Even how Prime Minister persuade the
nation that short-term move has nothing to do with GPIF, most people feel
uneasy about the future of their pension money, monthly deducted from their
salary. While elder people are worried about their pension benefit, young
workers are pessimistic on getting the return.
Negative elements surround Japanese
economy. Affected by slowdown of world economy, Japanese economy is showing no
good symptom. Japanese GDP in the fourth quarter of last year marked annual
-1.4%, caused by low-level individual consumption and housing investment. Although
Bank of Japan introduced negative rate policy, money seems to be going nowhere.
Abe’s high-rolling economic policy might invite serious consequence.
No comments:
Post a Comment