Watching shadow of Japanese economy, the
groundhog seems to have retreated to its burrow. On the day of show down in
2016 spring round of labor offensive, wages of workers proved to be as less
resilient from deflation as it had been last year. To the message of Shinzo Abe
administration for creating positive cycle of economic growth through higher
wages, corporations replied with negative attitude in distributing their profit
to employees. Trickle down theory in Abenomics does not look to be working.
Major companies in car making, electric
appliances and steel producers answered to the demands of their labor union
with less growth of labor wages than last year on Wednesday. The top car maker,
Toyota Motors, degraded increase of monthly wage from ¥4,000 last year to
¥1,500. Workers for Honda will receive only ¥1,100 more than last year, while
they enjoyed high wage hike of ¥3,400 a year ago. Most manufacturers contained
their wage hike within a half of last year’s level.
“Trend of business environment has
changed,” said President of Toyota, Akio Toyota. Toyota has been positive in
raising salary for two years. But, from the beginning of this year, Nikkei
average showed steep decline along with monetary policy of United States or
deceleration of emerging economy including China. Growing value of Japanese yen
against U.S. dollar put great pressure on exporters like Toyota. Managers of
corporations decided that it was not the time for paying more salary to its
workers as long as economic trend would not be preferable.
Abe administration has been encouraging
major corporations to raise salary of their workers. While finishing
reconstruction tax on corporations, the government introduced lower corporate
tax rate. It was aimed at higher wage for workers in big companies, which would
have positive impact on mid or small businesses. Abe dreamed “positive economic
cycle” with smooth circulation of wealth in every corner of Japanese economy. Needless
to say, however, each business entity is independent from the government in
terms of handling its management.
Even in two previous years of high growth
of wages, “actual wage” has been declining. Wage hike could not catch up with
inflation. Introducing higher consumption tax rate damaged positive mind of
consumers. According to Asahi Shimbun, actual individual consumption, which
occupies 60% of gross domestic products, is lower than the level before Abe
administration. In the meeting of analyzing international monetary at Prime
Minister’s residence on Wednesday, Joseph Stiglitz, Professor of Columbia
University, recommended Abe not to raise consumption tax rate next year. If Abe
decides it, breaking open promise when he once postponed it, it will mean
disaster of Abenimics.
No comments:
Post a Comment