May 3rd is broadly known as the
day Constitution of Japan was activated in 1947. But, the day is also memorized
as the beginning of Tokyo War Tribunal in 1946. Asahi Shimbun quoted the words
of a scholar that evaluated the tribunal: “The last act of the war, the first
act of the peace.” Putting a period on their history of bureaucratic despotism,
the Japanese embarked on the road of democracy with the tribunal.
Tokyo War Tribunal started on May 3rd,
1946, and ended on November 12th, 1948, with sentencing penalties to
the leaders of Imperial Japan. Eleven judges, selected from United States,
Soviet Union or other war winners, investigated war crimes exercised in the
period between January, 1928, when Japan started aggressive policy, and
September, 1945, when Japan signed a document of surrender.
According to Asahi coverage, Japanese war
criminals were separated into three categories, based on London Agreement in
August 1945. Ordinary war crimes including murder of prisoners or hostages were
categorized as B-Class. The judges added two other classes that were new
category of war crime. One was A-Class crime against peace, which planned or
started aggressive war. Another was C-Class crime against humanity, which
included massacre of ordinary people.
There were 28 A-Class defendants, including
Hideki Tojo, the Prime Minister at the time of starting the war. 25 defendants
were sentenced guilty and 7 of them were hanged. The act of war by United
Nations, such as dropping atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was not
subject of the tribunal. Emperor Hirohito was not listed in the defendants with
consideration for smooth occupation governance.
Through the testimony of war witnesses, the
Japanese people realized true aspect of the war. Nanjing Massacre was one of
the greatest surprises for ordinary Japanese. Anger against Japanese military
that had been concealing the facts swelled. The Japanese also recognized the
war as aggressive. The war had internally been explained as a war for
self-defense. But, the tribunal determined it to be an aggressive war. Although
frustration against ambiguous definition of aggression existed among Japanese
people, Prime Minister Tomi-ichi Murayama recognized the war as aggressive and officially
apologized in 1995.
Right wing movement still refuses
historiography of Tokyo War Tribunal. They criticize Murayama’s statement of
apology as masochistic. However, there would be no eyebrow-raising economic
growth in Japan without evaluating what the Japanese did in the war. Tokyo War
Tribunal has to be recognized as the starting point of peaceful modern Japan.
No comments:
Post a Comment