In the midst of the 7th National
Convention of Workers’ Party of Korea, government-own Korean Central News
Agency released the comprehensive activity report announced by First Secretary
of the party, Kim Jong-un. Korean Central Television disseminated the video
footage of Kim’s readout of the report as “specially important broadcasting.”
Well, what was special anyway? Maybe, it was because Kim unilaterally declared
that North Korea was a nuclear power.
In the speech for the convention, Kim
described his isolated nation as responsible nuclear-possessing state. “As long
as the opposite powers do not violate our self-determination, we will not
preventively use nuclear weapon and make effort to achieve non-nuclear world
through sincere implementation of our duty on non-proliferation,” told Kim. It
sounded like implementing the accumulated resolutions of United Nations
Security Council would not be their duty.
Kim also put the gravity on unification of
both Koreas. Contemplating the unification to be the most important and urgent
issue, Kim required Republic of Korea to discard the ambition of re-aggression
in Korean Peninsula, to apologize all the sin in the past against our nation
and not to disturb the unification.
Paralleling policy of military and economy
was explained as the course North Korea would permanently seek, even if it had
not been working so far. While the policy had heavily been relying on military,
Kim demanded accurate execution of multi-layered economic strategy with
scientific and realistic vision. The party will promote Five-year Strategy of
National Economic Development until 2020.
Analysts in Japan recognized realism in
Kim’s speech. Hajime Izumi, Professor of Tokyo International University, listed
three elements of North’s realism: not making five-year plan, but five-year
strategy, to avoid criticism on possible failure; not insisting on “union” as the
shape of unification with the South; and not stressing retreat of United States
Force in Korean Peninsula. Izumi found that the North thought that U.S. Force
in the peninsula was working as the deterrence against excessive action of the
South. It was recognized another realism policy that Kim referred to Japan only
on the past crime, not mentioning abduction issue that Japan had strictly been
accusing the North.
However, it is still unclear what Kim was
aiming at. In the situation of international accusation to unilateral nuclear
development, it is unlikely for North Korea to get preferable achievement in international
negotiation. Kim’s speech can still be regarded as nothing but the domestic message
from a powerful leader.
No comments:
Post a Comment