The financial ministers and governors of
central banks of seven developed nations agreed on taking fiscal measures for
economic growth based on the needs of each country. The chair country, Japan,
failed in achieving concerted announcement for fiscal mobilization, which had
been the most important goal for Japanese economy. Also appeared was opposition
over currency rate between Japan and United States. International economic
policy community was not controllable for the chair.
Group 7 Financial Ministers and Governors
of Central Bank Meeting in Sendai concluded that member countries would
mobilize three policies, fiscal mobilization, monetary policy and structural
reform. However, decision for fiscal mobilization was left to each government,
considering firm opposition from Germany. Suffering from consecutive spending
on refugee policy, German government cannot afford to spend budget for the
purpose of economic growth. “The most important is structural reform,” told
German Financial Minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, after the meeting.
Japan wanted to justify its own economic
policy based on positive expense of budget, which consists of one of the three
arrows of Abenomics. It expected Germany to be persuaded by other supporters
for fiscal mobilization, such as United States or France. But, United Kingdom
sided with European economic leader. It is unlikely that Japan can draw
compromise from German Chancellor Angela Merkel and achieve an agreement on
fiscal mobilization in the Summit Meeting later this month.
Japan also failed in agreeing with U.S. on
the recognition of excessively high value of Japanese yen. “We saw unilateral
and biased moves. It is necessary to stabilize foreign exchange,” said Japanese
Minister of Finance, Taro Aso, to U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Jacob Lew, in the
bilateral meeting before the G7 meeting. “It’s pretty high bar at disorderly
conditions,” told Lew. While G7 agreed on avoiding competitive currency
devaluation, bilateral difference still remains.
United States added Japan, as well as
China, on its watching list for foreign exchange practices in April. Against
Aso who emphasized his readiness for intervention to foreign exchange, Lew raised
the possibility of chain reaction of other nations, when Japan would move to
devaluation for its competitive exports. It is obvious that U.S. is skeptical on
Abenomics focusing on exporters.
One thing the parties agreed on was to
tackle the tax haven scandal, which some leaders in G7 was involved in. But, it
is unclear whether the group can build up functional framework. Decline of G7
power can be seen in this lack of actual agreement.
No comments:
Post a Comment