For Japan, the Group of Seven summit meeting in Brussels has
long been an automatic reminder of its identity as an only Asian nation
categorized in developed countries. Although the framework had ended its role
for leading the whole world, Japan insisted on acting as one of the top leaders
that would control the world order. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe this time behaved
as if he had conducted in laying containment policy against China.
Main issue for G7 meeting was inevitably how to deal with
Russia, that had dropped its membership in G8 and its status of hosting country
this year after unilateral annexation of Crimea earlier this year. The Summit
Declaration expressed its united denouncement against consecutive invasion of
Russia into integration of sovereignty and territory of Ukraine.
The position of Japan was not clear in that context. While
showing cooperation with Western nations, Abe had been keeping an option to
deal unilaterally with Putin to settle bilateral peace treaty issue including
territorial dispute. To disguise it, Abe insisted on inserting China factor in
the agreement. “I led the discussion on East Asia. My proposal for intolerance
of aggression with power was strongly supported by others,” Abe told the
reporters after the summit meeting.
So, what exactly was the result? The declaration has no
direct accusation against China. On maritime navigation and aviation, it
generally stated “We reaffirm the importance of maintaining order based upon
the universally agreed principles of international law.” The only description
reminding China was “We are deeply concerned by tensions in the East and South
China Sea.” Nevertheless, it seemed to be a great achievement for Abe, as far
as his convinced statements in the press conference was listened.
Abe tried to connect Ukraine issue with Chinese assertion in
Asia-Pacific region by drawing a concept of protesting against unilateral
change of status quo by exercise of power. But for all G7 nations except Japan,
unilateral change of status quo meant Russian invasion into Ukraine. European
nations were reluctant to complicate their relationship with China, which
apparently had been a great buyer of European products.
It was undeniable that Abe thought to take advantage of G7
consensus on China in his domestic personal agenda. If the world recognize potential
threat of China, it will be easier for him to promote his major policy to
exercise collective self-defense right, which the Constitution of Japan has prohibited.
As the matter of fact, his explanation on necessity of his policy has been too
trivial, unrealistic or nonsense to persuade the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment