The controversial election has passed over. Newspapers
reported the victory of the leading coalition of Liberal Democratic Party and
Komeito in the general election of the House of Representatives voted on
Sunday. The fact was that the two parties reduced their seats from 326 to 325.
However, that narrow margin represented survivability of the coalition. The
weak opposites are more responsible for LDP victory.
Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, showed his brightest smile
through TV footage. “We received thorough credibility from the voters not only
for my economic policy, but for my security policy, including exercising
collective self-defense right” was his message in his press conference. He believed
in himself that the voters gave him freehand in all policy, which was
apparently wrong.
Abe’s message of “there is no other way than this” was based
on the saying of “there is no alternative” by Margaret Thatcher. But it was not
Abe but the voters who had no alternative. Abe asked them whether he should
keep his economic agenda, even though its benefit had not been prevalent everywhere
in Japan. While he reiterated to convince him, the opposite parties could not
show viable economic policy for helping people in hardship. Voters were force
to take negative choice.
The priority is on constitutional amendment. Although Abe
carefully avoided revealing his intention to take initiative for it, he showed
his willingness to make effort to collect enough votes in both Houses. As a
result of the election, legislators supportive for the amendment exceeded required
two-thirds majority. It is necessary for them to build the same portion of
amendment power in the House of Councillors in the election 2016.
Serious was the defeat of the opposite. The top opposite actually
increased their seats. Democratic Party of Japan gained 73, adding 11 before
the election. In spite of that, the result of the election was too cruel. Party
leader, Banri Kaieda, lost his seat, while he had been traveling all over Japan
to support his colleagues. The party got back to their routine internal
quarrels seeking next leadership, which will drive the party to extermination.
Strangely enough, Japan Communist Party increased their
seats from 8 to 23. They asserted that voters had responded to their massage,
“This is a match of LDP vs. Communists.” It was not correct. The turnout of
voters marked the lowest of 52%, which was preferable for a party with firm
supporting organization. Less participants meant crisis of democracy, and the
Communists were simply benefited by this crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment