A lot of people guess a lot of things. The downfall of an
uncle of the North Korean leader caused various skepticisms about stability of
the regime. Whether it was the top leader’s boldness or rising of military
power, Kim Jong-un regime is supposed to increase bold attitude with his
reinforced power. The situation in Northeast Asia is going to be more
complicated.
Newspapers in Japan on Tuesday inserted a photograph when
North’s number two leader, Jiang Song-thaek, was arrested in front of comrades
in a meeting of politburo. The suspicion was that he had committed anti-party
and anti-revolutionary activities in order to expand his power in the administration.
His crimes also said to include giving national resources away in discount
prices, inappropriate relationship with multiple women, drinking, using drugs
and gambling abroad. Those were severely accused as “capitalistic.” In short,
he was stripped of all his power in the regime.
Jiang had been playing a role of the diplomatic
representative in relation with China. In the area close to the border with
China, Jiang was supporting economic development. It is fair to say he was
leading economic reform in North Korea. Specialists on the peninsula analyze
that the leadership did not like the reform oriented by economic approach,
instead of traditional priority of military.
One possibility is that Kim Jong-un took an initiative in
excluding Jiang with his leadership over military. To establish his power on
military leaders, Kim, as the supreme commander, might have demonstrated
unchanging status of military organization. However, some reports revealed
Kim’s lavish attitude in his policy exercise, which includes developing ski
resort or horse riding club. It is rather Kim who is the most capitalistic in
North Korea. With stepping down of his uncle, there is no person to remonstrate
with the extravagance of that young leader.
Another is retaliation of military against economic
reformers. Kim’s late father, Jong-il, appointed Jiang as political anchor against
military community for his succeeding son. After that structure was
established, political power has been overwhelming military. Commanders must
have seen it as an appeasement to foreign pressure for dismantling nuclear
weapons program and missile development.
There actually is nothing for Japan to make action against
the incident inside the North. Because Jiang had nothing to do with the
national project, his downfall would not affect solution of abduction issue of
the Japanese. The government of Japan only watches and sees what is going on.
No comments:
Post a Comment