Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry released a blueprint
of new Energy Basic Plan starting next year. It clearly changed the direction
of current energy policy, which has been seeking zero option of nuclear power
generation, into full use of the advantage of it. While the reason why nuclear
energy needs to be reduced has been clear, why nuclear power became important
is not clear. The plan can put this country in jeopardy, because next disaster
in nuclear power generation site will be really fatal to this nation.
Considering the ability of stable supply, generation cost
and low impact on global warming, the plan defined nuclear generation as an
important basic power resource. It required using nuclear power with precise
evaluation of total demands. However, this “basic resources” do not work at all
now. All the nuclear reactors are halted in Japan. Against the overestimated
necessity, Japan works as an independent country so far. So, what does “basic”
mean?
The draft did not indicate the details of how much
percentage nuclear generation will share future power supply, because it was
unclear how many nuclear reactors will be resumed. It also avoided elaborating
the possibility of new establishment of nuclear power plants, because they
wanted to dodge criticisms against positive attitude in a situation that
contaminated water in the First Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant is uncontrollably
flowing into the sea. It is obvious, however, that the ministry is trying to
pave the way for resumption of halted nuclear plants by emphasizing the
importance of them.
Surprisingly, the draft maintained the project of nuclear
recycle, which is reusing plutonium extracted from used nuclear fuels. The
project has kept on failing with technological difficulties in the examination
stage. No positive future has been shown in the project. The failure of it
means no solution in placing high-level nuclear waste in Japan. Even the
fundamental condition for the operation of nuclear power generation is not
provided.
The ministry is highly negative on renewable energy with no
reason except dismissing everything that may disturb promotion of nuclear
generation. Although the draft upheld “utmost acceleration” of renewable
energy, mainly solar and wind power, it also emphasized the negative aspects of
renewable energy such as high cost.
The draft looks like talking big dream of their empty hope.
One possible reason why the ministry keeps on dismissing the zero option would
be to deny the policies of former administration led by Democratic Party of
Japan, because bureaucrats never want the administration to come back.
No comments:
Post a Comment