The Emperor of Japan celebrated eightieth birthday on Monday.
In the press conference, His Majesty emphasized his commitment on protecting
the Constitution of Japan. Uh-oh, didn’t it completely contradict the
standpoint of Abe Shinzo administration, which has been deriding the
Constitution about the provisions of renouncing war and possession of military force.
Since the Constitution requires the Emperor to follow advice and approval of the
Cabinet, no political difference must not appear. After all, which was wrong:
the Emperor or the Prime Minister?
In the conference, the Emperor picked the World War II as
the most impressive event in his life. “It was really heartbreaking when I
remind of young people, who had a various hopes in their future, had lost their
lives,” he said. On reconstruction process, he showed his idea that the
Japanese has reconstructed current Japan by establishing the Constitution of
Japan regarding peace and democracy as precious, and by exercising a lot of
reforms. “I deeply thank,” he told, “the efforts made by many people to rebuild
exhausted land by the war.”
From the reporters, there was a question about the
relationship between politics and royal family. That was understandable enough,
because there were at least three opportunities in which the relationship of
them was broadly argued. Those were banzai call by Abe and his colleagues to
the Emperor at the end of the ceremony of Sovereignty Resumption Day on April
28, Princess Hisako Takamado’s attendance to general meeting of International
Olympic Committee in Buenos Aires, in which Tokyo won Olympic 2020, and handing
the Emperor out a letter about situation of sufferers of the East Japan Great
Earthquake by Councillor Taro Yamamoto.
Citing the Article IV, which determines that the Emperor has
no power related to government, His Majesty stressed his restriction of
activities as the Emperor. However, he added that “Sometimes it is difficult to
judge,” and he said he would consult with the Grand Steward of the Imperial
Household Agency at that situation.
The point is that the Emperor is one of the biggest
advocates of democracy in Japan, and strictly abiding by the Constitution, even
if Abe and other right-wing colleagues hated the Constitution as forced by
America. Although it was not clear whether he was skeptical about the assertive
policy of Abe administration, the Emperor was willing to be restricted within
the provisions of the Constitution, with a hope of maintaining peace. If Abe
moves to change the article to make the Emperor the head of state, and it
causes turmoil inside and outside Japan, it is highly skeptical that the
Emperor will support it. So it is Abe who should be accused as changing status
quo by power.
No comments:
Post a Comment