6/02/2017

Abdication May Be a Precedent

House of Representatives started discussion over the bill of Special Law for Emperor’s Abdication on Thursday. It was the first time for the Diet to discuss Emperor’s Abdication, since current Constitution was activated in 1947. While the conservative lawmakers were firmly opposing to make permanent law for abdication, Shinzo Abe administration explained that the law would be a precedent for the future Emperors. Without thorough discussion over constitutionality of Emperor’s voluntary abdication, the bill is supposed to pass the House on Friday.

After Meiji Restoration, the status of Emperor has been assumed as guaranteed through his lifetime. It was unusual for the Emperor to express his intention to abdicate last summer. According to the argument of lawmaker, Sumio Mabuchi, Democratic Party, in the Committee on Rules and Administration on Thursday, six out of ten Emperors retired before their deaths after 35th Kogyoku Emperor abdicated for the first time.

To the question of Mabuchi about possibility of being a precedent, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga recognized it, even if it would be a special law only applied to current Emperor Akihito. “Although it is the law for fulfilling His Majesty’s abdication, the process to construct the bill or basic idea of it can be a precedent,” told Suga. Democratic Party argued that abdication needs change of provisions in Imperial Household Law. As a compromise to make whole consensus on abdication, which was required by Constitution of Japan, the parties agreed on a notion that the abdication would be a precedent but exceptional.

One fundamental point was left behind. Article 4 of Constitution of Japan determines that the Emperor does not have powers related to government. If abdication with Emperor’s intention is possible, there will possibly be coercive or arbitral abdication in future thrones. To the question of Kazuo Kitagawa, Komeito, Director General of Cabinet Legislation Bureau, Yusuke Yokobatake, admitted the existence of issues like violating Article 4 or harming stable maintenance of Emperor or Imperial House.

In terms of stability of Imperial House, creating matrilineal house in imperial system is another issue. The parties agreed on adding additional resolution to the bill, which requested the government to consider matrilineal house. While Democratic Party argued that female family should be able to remain in Imperial House after marriage, the conservatives in Liberal Democratic Party strongly opposed it.


The bill determines the activation of the law within three years after the announcement. It will be possible for Emperor Akihito to leave at the end of next year after the bill passes the Diet.

No comments:

Post a Comment